Why I Stopped Trusting AI Subscriptions
LinkedIn Post (Text-Only, Teaser)
GitHub Copilot started training on my code. Not opt-in. Not a checkbox. Just: your prompts now belong to us — unless you noticed this buried in a changelog and turned it off.
I left that afternoon.
The trust broke in five minutes. And once broken, I couldn’t unsee the rest: locked to one provider, opaque about data, paying to be the product.
That’s not ownership. It’s tenancy.
I went looking for alternatives. Warp wanted a separate subscription. OpenCode worked great — until three weeks into every billing cycle, the spinner stopped.
Same pattern everywhere: leave one locked-in tool, find another.
The best AI development environment is the one you can take apart and rebuild. That realization sent me somewhere unexpected.
#AIDevelopment #DeveloperTools #Privacy
Comment (First Comment)
Full story on Medium → https://alvian.medium.com/why-i-stopped-trusting-ai-subscriptions
Notes
- Schedule on Fedica: https://fedica.com/
- Post text-only (no links in main body)
- CTA: teaser ends with a hook
- Comment: “Full story on Medium → https://alvian.medium.com/why-i-stopped-trusting-ai-subscriptions”
- Schedule comment to post immediately after post goes live
- Wait 10-15 minutes before engaging with comments
- Addendum: The March 25 announcement included the opt-out toggle. GitHub later clarified the label (“Allow GitHub to use my data for AI model training”) and confirmed future data won’t be used after opting out. Still opt-out not opt-in, but if commenters ask — this addresses the original concern. Noted in full blog post.