LinkedIn Post (Text-Only, Teaser)

Two drafts. One tried to squeeze six months of decisions into a single 3,000-word post. The other was a flat walkthrough that never said why anyone should care.

Both had strong material. Both had structural problems.

I ran them through an AI editorial pipeline — not to write for me, but to review, critique, and iterate until the structure held.

Five phases: lead agent review, iterative revision (including catching its own fabricated story), cold-read by fresh agents who didn’t know what they were reading, content mapping into a 9-post series, parallel execution with one agent per post.

The AI didn’t write a word of the final posts. It told me where drafts were missing. I filled the gaps.

The process is replicable. Same pipeline works for any draft — critique, rewrite, cold-read, restructure, execute. I packaged it into a reusable /writer command so I don’t rebuild the process every time. The agents change. The structure stays.

It’s not faster writing. It’s more deliberate writing.

#AIAgents #Writing #DeveloperTools #AIDevelopment #TechnicalWriting


Comment (First Comment)

Full story on Medium → https://alvian.medium.com/how-i-used-ai-agents-as-my-editorial-pipeline


Notes